Peer review policy
This journal is published by Al-Mustafa International University and is committed to implementing the peer-reviewed peer review process, in accordance with COPE's Code of Conduct and Best Practices, and authors may find peer-reviewed guidelines and guidelines. Reviewers The peer review process for publishing a journal is essentially a quality control mechanism. It is a process in which experts evaluate scientific works and its goal is to ensure the high quality of published science. However, peer reviewers do not decide whether to accept or reject articles. Recommend the maximum decision. In peer-reviewed journals, decision-making authority rests solely with the journal's editor or editorial board. In fact, it is the editor of the magazine who plays a pivotal role in the decision-making process.

Journal Decision-Making Process

Each manuscript is first initial screened by the editor and if its subject matter is suitable for the possible consideration and its content is relatively mature, it will be presented to the editorial board meeting according to the below flowchart. It will then be sent to two to three reviewers. If an article is accepted by the reviewers, it will be presented at the editorial board meeting and after the approval, it will reach the author's information system through the editor in chief and after the final corrections, the paper will be published by the publisher. It should be noted that before the final acceptance, the corresponding author must complete, sign and send the copyright and conflict of interest forms on behalf of himself and other co-authors to the Journal Office.

The detailed Journal peer review process is based on the following Flow Diagram: